August 8-15, 2004: Lake Powell, Utah, with a Huge Crew

One of many trip reports under the SilGro home page for Alan Silverstein and Cathie Grow.
Email me at ajs@frii.com.
Last update: March 27, 2024
(Previous trip report: 2004_0508-09_NorthwestNebraska.htm)


Adapted from email I sent:

From:  Alan Silverstein <ajs@frii.com>
Date:  16 Aug 2004 13:37:17 -0600
Subject:  Re:  [Lake_Powell_2000] Love to hear the trip reports
To:  Lake_Powell_2000@yahoogroups.com

...I just got back from a week (7 nights) leading a trip on my 62' private houseboat out of Bullfrog Marina at Lake Powell, Utah. I set a lot of personal records by allowing a far-and-away biggest crew ever: 18 people, including six in the 9-18 age range. It was surprisingly fun and uneventful, as the crew were all great folks, very easygoing and helpful. We had two ski boats and I delegated tasks like crazy. Still I found it very busy for me, and I am now quite tired, back at home, digging out.

On my trips we usually move the boat almost daily, and we did that again; six mooring spots in seven nights. I like to get around and see a lot of the canyons. Also learning how to clip anchor lines to themselves around boulders and avoid anchors => much easier.

Some highlights...

My GPS logged 178 miles(!) on the houseboat in about 32 hours. More records. In retrospect we should have taken the boat to Dangling Rope on Wednesday and never gone as far as Piute, oh well.


From:  Alan Silverstein <ajs@frii.com>
Date:  17 Aug 2004 13:25:54 -0600
Subject:  post-Powell info on Gregory Natural Bridge
To:  (person at Natural Arch and Bridge Society)

Last Tuesday (August 10) I visited Fiftymile Canyon again. I was all alone for two hours with a kayak (ski boat dropoff). I dove four times to the underside roof of Gregory Natural Bridge and got a good measurement, 28'0" down plus or minus a few inches, but this might be the "upper roof" angling up from the real arch. I saw the latter, but could not get deep enough to see through it. This underwater bridge is massive.

I took the measurement by tying a light, weighted line to the kayak, pulling it snug down at the edge of the roof, holding the spot until surfacing, tying a knot, and later measuring it with a 100' tape. I adjusted for the small distance, about 5", from the knot on the kayak to the water level. The line itself was at a slight angle, not vertical, since the roof of the arch is concave, but I don't think this mattered much.

On the fourth dive I double-checked the knot, then forced myself a bit deeper below the sharp roof edge, to see to my chagrin the arch itself a bit lower still. I only had a moment, and surfaced gasping and a bit dizzy -- so I quit diving at that point.

Anyway, about the lake level... Dropping fast. They report it at midnight and it's ambiguous, one source is a day ahead of the other. One source says 3577.38' on Aug 10, the other on Aug 11, so I conclude that must be the night of Aug 10. It was 3577.64' previously. So noontime Aug 10, estimate 3577.5', deduct 28' (or a bit less) to get 3549.5' (or a bit more) for the underside of the sharp roof, even though the high point of the arch itself is perhaps a bit lower.

I also dragged the kayak up and down (over a sandbar) to the "back pool" (now connected only by the bridge) to photo and dive a few times on the upstream side. I didn't even try to get deep enough to see through it, just watched for signs of light coming through, and did see that on the second dive. The upstream side was slightly away from the sun, and also lacked any reference points for the location of the bridge.

I checked the rock on both sides for a way to get to the top of the lintel. No joy. Maybe a long hike in from some other up and out point, but I didn't have time. I did take another set of photos (I'll get them to you eventually) we could use for extrapolation. Clearly the top is only a bit below the high water line, say 3690'. That would make the bridge's thickness roughly 3690 - 3550 = 140', and the height based on May, no more than 90-35 = 55'.

Unfortunately I did not bring a long enough line for a depth measurement... Sigh. I only had 50' (measured at 46'+ with knots) and it didn't reach. However, the silt level on the bottom is undoubtedly many feet now anyway.

(Next trip report: 2004_1016-17_CathiesCabin.htm)